This is a critical notice of Timothy Williamson's, The Philosophy of Philosophy (Blackwell, 2007). It focuses on criticizing the book's two main positive proposals: that we should “replace true belief by knowledge in a principle of charity constitutive of content”, and that “the epistemology of metaphysically modal thinking is tantamount to a special case of the epistemology of counterfactual thinking”
Epistemology, also known as the theory of knowledge, will flourish as long as we deem knowledge valu...
Timothy Williamson and Sebastian Sunday-Grève discuss the question of where philosophy starts, and t...
Is understanding epistemic in nature? Does a correct account of what constitutes understanding of a ...
This is a critical notice of Timothy Williamson's, The Philosophy of Philosophy (Blackwell, 2007). ...
Timothy Williamson's 2000 book Knowledge and Its Limits is perhaps the most important work of philos...
Williamson’s cognitive turn In Knowledge and Its Limits, as well as in a number of papers, Timothy ...
According to Conceptualism, philosophy is an independent discipline that can be pursued from the arm...
According to Timothy Williamson, philosophy is not a mere conceptual investigation and does not invo...
The book is primarily an essay on the epistemology of the sort of armchair knowledge that we can hop...
We know facts, but we also know how to do things. To know a fact is to know that a proposition is tr...
Philosophy begins and ends in disagreement. Philosophers disagree among themselves in innumerable wa...
Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits has been highly influential since the beginning of thi...
This paper examines Timothy Williamson's recent 'expertise defense' of armchair philosophy m...
What is knowledge? Why is it valuable? How much of it do we have (if any at all), and what ways of t...
What is knowledge? Why is it valuable? How much of it do we have (if any at all), and what ways of t...
Epistemology, also known as the theory of knowledge, will flourish as long as we deem knowledge valu...
Timothy Williamson and Sebastian Sunday-Grève discuss the question of where philosophy starts, and t...
Is understanding epistemic in nature? Does a correct account of what constitutes understanding of a ...
This is a critical notice of Timothy Williamson's, The Philosophy of Philosophy (Blackwell, 2007). ...
Timothy Williamson's 2000 book Knowledge and Its Limits is perhaps the most important work of philos...
Williamson’s cognitive turn In Knowledge and Its Limits, as well as in a number of papers, Timothy ...
According to Conceptualism, philosophy is an independent discipline that can be pursued from the arm...
According to Timothy Williamson, philosophy is not a mere conceptual investigation and does not invo...
The book is primarily an essay on the epistemology of the sort of armchair knowledge that we can hop...
We know facts, but we also know how to do things. To know a fact is to know that a proposition is tr...
Philosophy begins and ends in disagreement. Philosophers disagree among themselves in innumerable wa...
Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits has been highly influential since the beginning of thi...
This paper examines Timothy Williamson's recent 'expertise defense' of armchair philosophy m...
What is knowledge? Why is it valuable? How much of it do we have (if any at all), and what ways of t...
What is knowledge? Why is it valuable? How much of it do we have (if any at all), and what ways of t...
Epistemology, also known as the theory of knowledge, will flourish as long as we deem knowledge valu...
Timothy Williamson and Sebastian Sunday-Grève discuss the question of where philosophy starts, and t...
Is understanding epistemic in nature? Does a correct account of what constitutes understanding of a ...